From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.198.187] (helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1INEWo-0001fO-Tl for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:11:15 +0200 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c24so1008867rvf for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.209.7 with SMTP id l7mr2982272rvq.1187644217760; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sweta-singhs-computer.local ( [71.146.5.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l31sm1818053rvb.2007.08.20.14.10.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46CA0337.9050709@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:10:15 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Subject: Re: Add Intel Core 2 machine support (prescott and nocona) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:11:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to add support for Intel's Core 2 processors, in both 32 > and 64 bit mode. > > I am wondering what namespace to use for the PACKAGE ARCHs? > > Given all the options[*], I think "x86-prescott" and "x86_64-nocona" > are suitable: > > x86_64-prescott= x86_32-core = x86_32-core2 > x86_64-nocona = x86_64-core2 > > The naming is a bit to long to suite my taste, maybe prescott and > nocona are enough? > > I would like some input on this before I commit anything and pollute > the namespace. > > Regards, I would suggest just add conf/machine/core2.conf and another conf/machine/tune-core2.inc file to have the special gcc flags. I would not add it as a separate arch but stick with x86. To me it sounds more confusing to have x86 and core separated out into two different basic arches. Just my 2 cents. - -Khem -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGygM3HnJKy6V6em4RAnk4AJ0Xw4JlBqos/8xA60x59GkAbOYvhwCffGm+ AMhMc3UVpCmd1qTCmlVT570= =ES0x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----