From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail145.messagelabs.com ([216.82.245.115]) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1INOia-0005NF-PB for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:04:06 -0400 Received: from [192.168.65.61] (unknown [192.168.65.61]) by mail.magtech.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CEA8947CE for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:03:59 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46CA9C6F.3080604@magtech.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:03:59 +1000 From: Aras Vaichas MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MTD-LIST Subject: best IO Scheduler for MTD based embedded systems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, What is the recommended kernel "IO Scheduler" for a system with, say, JFFS2 on NAND Flash that is basically running a single application for most of its life? In our current system we've been using the NOOP (i.e. nothing) scheduler. I'm currently reviewing and upgrading the kernel so I was wondering if this was the best choice? Aras ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________