Re: RFC: Fix for bug 1744 and some restructuring of omap kernel bb files.

[Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1550 bytes --]

I have given it a quick look, and it looks reasonable. It appears to 
drop OABI support, which I think is OK, except for the celinux distro 
(not sure).

The only real concern I have is that we would like to move to the 
linux.inc/linux_2.6.x.bb style of kernel bb files. Should we push this, 
or wait until we can convert the omap/davinci kernels to linux.inc? I 
shouldn't even look at this until September ...

Philip

Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi Koen et al.
> 
> I have been looking into omap structure of late and found that it was
> hard to add a new machine to same kernel build without some
> duplication. So I went ahead and tried to fix it. Attached patch also
> fixes bug 1744.
> 
> I have moved the defconf files to kernel-<version>/$MACHINE folder and
> I expect that we add machine specific patches if needed here too.
> 
> I have built omap5912osk and omap2430sdp machine kernels with this
> change and they built and worked ok.
> 
> However I have also made changes to other omap related files which I
> believe I correct but it would be helpful if someone could test them.
> 
> I havent changed the old kernel bb files. If this looks ok and
> applicable I can do that too.
> 
> Is it ok?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Khem
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]