From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tytso@us.ibm.com,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Priority boosting for preemptible RCU
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:09:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46CEAE41.7060001@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070822124340.16a891f2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + rbdp = per_cpu(rcu_boost_dat, cpu);
>> + for (i = 0; i < RCU_BOOST_ELEMENTS; i++) {
>> + rbdp[i].rbs_mutex = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
>
> Doesn't this confound lockdep? We're supposed to use spin_lock_init().
>
> Andy, can we have a checkpatch rule for SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED please? It's
> basically always wrong.
ERROR: Use of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED is deprecated: see
Documentation/spinlocks.txt
#58: FILE: Z17.c:55:
+ rbdp[i].rbs_mutex = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
Also picks up the RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED version too.
-apw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 19:02 [PATCH RFC] Priority boosting for preemptible RCU Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-22 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-22 20:23 ` Josh Triplett
2007-08-22 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-22 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-22 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-24 10:09 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2007-08-23 4:26 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-23 8:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-23 10:14 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-23 13:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-23 14:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-23 15:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-24 8:21 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-24 17:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46CEAE41.7060001@shadowen.org \
--to=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.