From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] RT-Socket-CAN driver for EMS CPC PCI card
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:54:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46CF2970.6070804@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46CC16CD.7080603@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2284 bytes --]
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the following patch changes:
>
> 2007-08-22 Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
>
> * ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000: Add the RT-Socket-CAN SJA1000 driver
> rtcan_ems_pci.c for the EMS CPC PCI card from EMS Dr. Thomas
> Wuensche (http://www.ems-wuensche.de).
>
> I would like to apply it to Xenomai's trunk and v2.3.x branch.
>
I few quick comments from my side:
- Could you submit new code already Lindent'ified? This keeps the
effort bounded to convert the rest one day.
> Index: ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ems_pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ems_pci.c (revision 0)
> +++ ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ems_pci.c (revision 0)
...
> +#define EMS_PCI_SINGLE 0 /* this is a single channel device */
This define is unused - is this intended?
> +static int rtcan_ems_pci_add_chan(struct pci_dev *pdev, int channel,
> + struct rtcan_device **master_dev)
> +{
> + struct rtcan_device *dev;
> + struct rtcan_sja1000 *chip;
> + struct rtcan_ems_pci *board;
> + unsigned long addr;
> + int ret, init_step = 1;
ret!=0 always means error here? In that case I find "err" a more telling
variable name ("if (err) ..." -- personal flavour).
> + /* Register and setup interrupt handling */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SHIRQ_LEVEL
> + chip->irq_flags = RTDM_IRQTYPE_SHARED;
> +#else
> + chip->irq_flags = 0;
> +#endif
That #ifdef is redundant, just use RTDM_IRQTYPE_SHARED unconditionally.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SHIRQ_LEVEL
> + if ((ret = rtcan_ems_pci_add_chan(pdev, EMS_PCI_MASTER,
> + &master_dev)))
> + goto failure_cleanup;
> + if ((ret = rtcan_ems_pci_add_chan(pdev, EMS_PCI_SLAVE,
> + &master_dev)))
> + goto failure_cleanup;
> +#else
> + printk("Shared interrupts not enabled, using single channel!\n");
> + if ((ret = rtcan_ems_pci_add_chan(pdev, EMS_PCI_MASTER,
> + &master_dev)))
> + goto failure_cleanup;
> +#endif
The master registration should be moved out off the #ifdef - it's identical.
Besides this, I have no concerns merging it, also into 2.3. Thanks for
your effort!
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 10:58 [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] RT-Socket-CAN driver for EMS CPC PCI card Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-08-24 18:54 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2007-08-24 19:29 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46CF2970.6070804@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=wg@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.