From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40F6DDE26 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:52:32 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.16]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65D33033F9 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-01.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.41]) by mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA275ABAE0 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.2] (e181053021.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.181.53.21]) (Authenticated sender: florian.boelstler@arcor.de) by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A335B1B3264 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46D193A3.70601@arcor.de> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:52:19 +0200 From: Florian Boelstler MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC] xmon: setjmp / longjmp implementation problems References: <46CE0CF6.2010804@arcor.de> In-Reply-To: <46CE0CF6.2010804@arcor.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Just for the record: I made a mistake in my userspace test environment regarding the setjmp/longjmp implementation. I defined setjmp/longjmp functions as static ones, which triggered recent compilers to inline. Inlining breaks setjmp/longjmp of course. Further I realized that the NuBus-specific setjmp/longjmp was also defined as static functions. For xmon this was never the case (even defined in a separate file). Thanks to David Gibson and Sergei Shtylyov for answering my questions on #mklinux. Cheers, Florian