From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
"Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187904169.2435.83.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com>
Daniel Walker pisze:
[snip]
> Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
Yes, I have considered it.
Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
a regression field, but there are no difference between
2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
Most people are reporting bugs through LKML:
- 23 regressions with reference to LKML
- 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla
> If you had a
> search of open bugs they would just fall of the list as they get
> closed..
Unfortunately, the world is not perfect.
Is anyone interested in maintaining KR list for stable releases?
>
> Daniel
>
>
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-27 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 0:06 nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Daniel Walker
2007-08-08 14:20 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-08-08 15:20 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-20 16:44 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-23 20:08 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-23 21:22 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 0:45 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
2007-08-27 7:51 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 9:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-27 11:35 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 16:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 11:38 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-27 15:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:26 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 17:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 19:12 ` David Rees
2007-08-29 7:42 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-29 22:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-29 23:59 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-30 8:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-30 15:24 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <32209efe0708300950r5787402l4d02cedd862314fd@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-30 22:11 ` Al Boldi
2007-09-03 12:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-03 13:20 ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-30 15:54 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Bill Davidsen
2007-09-03 12:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 16:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 16:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 17:08 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 8:11 ` David Rees
2007-08-27 11:42 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 14:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:54 ` nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 17:55 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 22:55 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 23:07 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 9:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 14:34 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 17:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 18:30 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 19:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 20:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 21:24 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-30 1:21 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-30 21:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 16:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 16:35 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 18:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 0:24 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 1:00 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 1:36 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-09-01 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 20:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 9:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-28 20:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 20:21 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com \
--to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.