From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sympatec.com (mail.sympatec.net [217.5.250.35]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9E8DDF67 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:26:22 +1000 (EST) Received: from [172.20.3.151] (account rutsch [172.20.3.151] verified) by sympatec.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTPSA id 1970004 for linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:29:36 +0200 Message-ID: <46D26E3F.8040309@sympatec.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:25:03 +0200 From: Oliver Rutsch MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: STK5200 pci_enable_device problem References: <20070826211021.BD3E724047@gemini.denx.de> In-Reply-To: <20070826211021.BD3E724047@gemini.denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, [...] >> It's not so easy to compile the PLX drivers on the 4.1 ELDK because of >> missing headers in the ppc architecture. I managed to build the drivers >> for the 2.6.19 kernel and I was able to work with the card except the >> DMA routines (still working on this issue). > > WHy don't you use the arch/powerpc configuration, then? Note that the > STK5200 has never been supported in a 2.6 kernel with a arch/ppc > configuration. > Because I found at least a lite5200 configuration in the 4.1 ELDK (2.6.19.2 kernel) in the ARCH/ppc architecure. With ARCH/powerpc I only had a few configurations for other modules and I wasn't able to build a running kernel for the TQM5200 (maybe my fault). Is there support for the TQM5200 and the STK5200 with ARCH/powerpc in newer kernels? I'm still using the 3.1.1 ELDK for the TQM5200 as it have everything I need and I don't need to use the PLX card in this board (although it would have been nice if I got it working...). Bye, -- Dipl. Ing. Oliver Rutsch