From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <jambunathan@netxen.com>
Subject: Re: PCI Passthru: fn0 exported but not fn1
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:57:49 +0530
Message-ID: <46D2ED75.1000906@netxen.com>
References: <C2F8AAE2.CE94%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C2F8AAE2.CE94%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Sanjeev Jorapur <sanjeev@netxen.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27/8/07 15:08, "Jambunathan K" <jambunathan@netxen.com> wrote:
> 
>> I confirming that this is a regression from xen304 to xen310. (I
>> verified just the 'BACKEND_PASS' config)
>>
>> I had cursorily looked at pciback and pcifront code changes between
>> xen304 to xen310. My not so discerning eye couldn't catch any
>> differences that do matter.
>>
>> For now I have reverted my working tree to Xen-304. I would appreciate
>> if you could provide a patch that addresses this issue in Xen310.
> 
> What is the regression? That pcifront does not scan fn!=0 if fn==0 is empty?
> 
>  -- Keir
> 

Behaviorally speaking, I can export *just* fn1 on Xen304. But I can't
export *just* fn1 on Xen310.

I am calling this difference in behaviour a regression.

Jambunathan K.