From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l7SFCqfL008842 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:12:52 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l7SFCoM5004612 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:12:51 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t8so2020168wxc for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46D43B6F.5050902@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:12:47 -0500 From: Darrel Goeddel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Moore CC: Venkat Yekkirala , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, James Morris , Darrel Goeddel , Stephen Smalley , kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com, joe@nall.com, Eric Paris Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] Static/fallback external labels for NetLabel References: <46D43808.4050008@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46D43808.4050008@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Darrel Goeddel wrote: > Paul, why the netif/host combo in the original netlabel fallback patch? > Why not just hosts (or really network/netmask)? Can we make the > Sorry, don't know what happened to the rest of the text... Can we make the netif optional or add a wildcard netif? That would allow for a truly generic fallback if desired. Currently if you add a new interface, you need to go back and add a new rule (I think, could be wrong since I haven't actually tried it). -- Darrel -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.