From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: unshare() pid ns Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:10:51 +0400 Message-ID: <46D67B8B.2000606@openvz.org> References: <20070830052928.GA27864@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070830052928.GA27864-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: sukadev-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org sukadev-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org wrote: > Pavel, > > unshare() of pid ns seems to fail with -EINVAL in 2.6.23-rc3-mm1. > I thought we supported it in the earlier patchsets. I guess > I missed that in the review of recent patchsets. I disabled unsharing of pid namespaces because it's almost impossible. Look - you have to reattach all the pids to the task with saving its ids as seen in previous namespaces. > Did we remove/disable it on purpose ? I am not particular that we > support it though. Just want to make sure. > > Suka >