From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46D82916.10106@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:43:34 -0700 From: Ulrich Drepper MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: SE-Linux , Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: use the OS functionality for reading References: <46D495A1.20505@redhat.com> <1188506154.26572.378.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <1188562726.26572.394.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1188562726.26572.394.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Smalley wrote: > So...what would you think of keeping PF_USE_MEMORY as is for the policy > reading side (since it is actually simpler and avoids introducing an > additional error case), but switching over the policy writing side to > using the new approach? It's your call. As explained in the other mail, I say it's safer to change it over. Given who your employer is you should be all for safety. It's a proactive step to avoid mistakes. The current code is only shorter because of the current interfaces. If you're willing to change them things can be cleaned up significantly. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG2CkW2ijCOnn/RHQRAn3RAKClFjZDCgy8f+YmHT1qzgNDUomiMQCgrVPF b3sAslF2WT5CPwL6y2WFbnI= =/9JD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.