From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cedric Le Goater Subject: Re: [RFC] Container mini-summit agenda for Sept 3, 2007 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: <46D82CC4.5010809@fr.ibm.com> References: <46D69653.1090003@fr.ibm.com> <46D78A5E.3030304@cs.columbia.edu> <46D824FA.2080300@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46D824FA.2080300-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Cedric Le Goater Cc: Kir Kolyshkin , Rohit Seth , Linux Containers , Paul Menage , office-xGb7/i2pWyrYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Alasdair Kergon , Pavel Emelianov List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org >> Many of these were discussed in a recent Zap paper present in USENIX: >> http://www.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/publications/usenix2007_fordist.pdf >> The paper describes important design choices in Zap (but I'm biased ...). >> I think it may serve as an appetizer for the discussion :P > > Thanks, I hope we all have time to read it. The abstract says : "... Our results show checkpoint and restart times 3 to 55 times faster than OpenVZ and 5 to 1100 times faster than Xen." I'm impressed ! :) When can we play it ? Thanks for the appetizer ! C.