From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Clock Source Kernel settings in 2.6.22
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 11:45:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46DAA266.8070601@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45E4FD623F464B30A0067FF269007B89@shadow>
[Please keep me in CC/To, I don't read lartc often]
Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
> I used to get an average of 18900kbit.
> My hope was that these new patches would bring better accuracy.
Well, you're up from 94.5% to 99.95%, so they seem to do :)
> Notice the 24 cburst. I am just trying to compensate the inaccuracy
> this way. If I remove the cburst, obviously the shape rate I get goes
> down.
>
> Perhaps I am missing something. I am just a novice trying to get
> exact bandwidth shaping. I have tested all the clock source types with
> no good results.
A couple of comments:
- The patches so far only improve things on x86
- Try to test using UDP (not sure if you did) or simply a ping flood,
TCP is not ideal.
- iproute calculates burst values automatically. With the higher
precision clock source you can use a smaller value (also done
automatically if you don't specify them).
- HFSC is more precise than HTB (and not the least more complicated
to configure if you use only linear service curves)
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-02 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-29 13:24 [LARTC] Clock Source Kernel settings in 2.6.22 Mario Antonio Garcia
2007-08-31 9:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-08-31 18:46 ` Mario Antonio Garcia
2007-09-02 11:45 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46DAA266.8070601@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.