From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philip Craig Subject: Re: /proc/net/ip_conntrack trange behavior Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:03:14 +1000 Message-ID: <46DB8782.1080207@snapgear.com> References: <46CE8C05.5060202@nj.cpsecure.com> <200708290914.l7T9E934019648@toshiba.co.jp> <46D5BFB5.6000206@trash.net> <46D61A10.6010405@nj.cpsecure.com> <46D66874.1050405@trash.net> <46D6927F.1010406@nj.cpsecure.com> <46D7E687.7060404@nj.cpsecure.com> <46DB80D3.5050402@nj.cpsecure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Patrick McHardy To: Dong_Wei@nj.cpsecure.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46DB80D3.5050402@nj.cpsecure.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Dong_Wei wrote: > what kind of rules should I take? It's seemed that there is no rule to > deal with this special case on 2.4 :( $IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state NEW -j DROP (From http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html#NEWNOTSYN)