From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [RFC] Container mini-summit agenda for Sept 3, 2007 Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:32:46 +0400 Message-ID: <46DBD4BE.4000901@openvz.org> References: <46D69653.1090003@fr.ibm.com> <46DBC9C5.5060101@fr.ibm.com> <6599ad830709030203s50ad1ab1vb0cdf21be0ab023@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6599ad830709030203s50ad1ab1vb0cdf21be0ab023-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Paul Menage Cc: Kir Kolyshkin , Rohit Seth , Linux Containers , office-xGb7/i2pWyrYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Alasdair Kergon List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Paul Menage wrote: > On 9/3/07, Cedric Le Goater wrote: >> http://download.openvz.org/~xemul/minisummit.odp >> > > I notice ?s against "Task scheduler" and "Network scheduler". > > Is "Task scheduler" meant to represent "CPU scheduler" or "task count > limit". If the former, CFS in the mainline should provide a lot of > what we need, and has already been linked with task containers by > Srivatsa Vaddagiri. Yes, task scheduler is the CPU scheduler. > Network scheduling is already fairly advanced in Linux - all we need > is a way to be able to feed container information into existing Linux > traffic control concepts. We've played with an approach that lets us > tag a container with a particular id, and then use that id as the > primary classifier in a standard HTB controller, and it seems to be > fairly successful. > > Paul >