From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:50:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46DC030E.9070704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46DBDA84.3050505@vc.cvut.cz>
Hello,
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> I have recompiled kernel with all debugging disabled, and it brought me
> 1.5MBps, so it is still consistently 1MBps slower than on sil. Disabling
> NCQ seems to improve concurrent access a bit (for which I have no
> explanation), while slows down single drive scenario:
>
> With NCQ:
>
> 1TB alone: 81.22, 79.86
> 1TB+1TB: 56.28+56.70, 53.51+56.11
>
> Without NCQ:
>
> 1TB alone: 79.78, 80.82
> 1TB+1TB: 57.99+58.12, 56.50+56.46
>
> 3512 sil, no NCQ:
>
> 1TB alone: 82.28, 82.18
> 1TB+1TB: 47.20+47.54 # Here apparently command based switching or
> 1.5Gbps link between device and PMP becomes bottleneck
Hmmmm.... Weird. Is the different still there if you take PMP out of
the picture?
> And it seems that I observe what other poster pointed out - that
> apparently all SiI chips are limited somewhere around 120-130MBps, and
> cannot do more even if you pretty ask...
Yeah, that seems to be the hardware limit and is consistent with what I
hear from non-linux people too.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-03 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-27 4:55 Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP Richard Scobie
2007-08-27 7:11 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-03 8:59 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-03 9:57 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-03 12:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-09-04 1:38 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-05 12:08 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-05 21:30 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-09-06 9:52 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-06 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-06 17:59 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-03 19:39 Richard Scobie
2007-09-03 20:34 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-09-03 21:21 ` Richard Scobie
2007-08-27 8:08 Richard Scobie
2007-08-27 22:49 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-08-15 13:58 Rusty Conover
2007-08-17 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-20 19:56 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-21 2:42 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 3:03 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 5:00 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 5:43 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 6:11 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 6:39 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 6:56 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 7:02 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 7:49 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-25 2:19 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-26 16:37 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-27 1:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-14 23:39 Rusty Conover
2007-08-15 6:10 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46DC030E.9070704@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.