From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755557AbXIDUsS (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:48:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753628AbXIDUsL (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:48:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37738 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753296AbXIDUsK (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:48:10 -0400 Message-ID: <46DDC462.2040309@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:47:30 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel CC: Venkatesh Pallipadi , Andrew Morton , "Brown, Len" Subject: What's happening with the cpuidle code? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A look at the 'cpuidle' branch of git-acpi shows a commit e40cede7d63a029e92712a3fe02faee60cc38fb4, "cpuidle: first round of documentation updates" that doesn't show up in that branch online. The entire Documentation/cpuidle directory is missing from the tree when looking at the web pages, and it's missing from git-acpi.patch in 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 (but the patch shows up in the summary information in the patch header.) Where did it go? And how can -mm be used to test things if its patches don't even match their own headers?