From: David Hawkins <dwh@ovro.caltech.edu>
To: Leonid <Leonid@a-k-a.net>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: PCI target implementation on AMCC PPC CPUs
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:15:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E05FFD.3020605@ovro.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <406A31B117F2734987636D6CCC93EE3C022417D2@ehost011-3.exch011.intermedia.net>
Hi Leonid,
> Does somebody have any experience of using AMCC PPC chips (such as
> PPC440ep) or any other PPC at all as PCI target (slave)? PPC440ep has
> PCI-PLB bridge which certainly can be configured as slave. CPU will need
> to do configuration and then I assume another CPU (PCI host) will be
> able to access all memories via the bridge including peripherals'
> controllers. Slave CPU involvement would be minimal then.
>
> Can anybody point me to design like this or to that end to any SW design
> where PPC CPU works as PCI slave?
I have an application where I want to communicate with up
to 20 cPCI slaves per cPCI chassis, where the slave devices
each use a PowerPC based processor. (The masters happen
to be x86 CPUs; because I have them).
I looked at the 440EP using the Yosemite board
http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/powerpc_440ep.pdf
and the Freescale MPC8349E
http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/powerpc_mpc8349e.pdf
I had some trouble the with AMCC chips; the DMA controller
operation was weird, and AMCC tech support was pretty
much useless.
Freescale's technical (design) support is great, and they
(the software developers; Kim, Timur, etc) are actively
maintaining/contributing to git trees for u-boot and Linux.
If you can change processors, I'd recommend any Freescale
part over an AMCC part.
I'm working on a cPCI board design at the moment, you're
welcome to look at the design;
* PowerPC
* Altera Stratix II FPGAs
* dual 8-bit 1GHz ADCs
http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/carma_board/
Regards,
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-06 18:24 finding out the processor frequency Leisner, Martin
2007-09-06 18:43 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-06 19:15 ` Josh Boyer
2007-09-06 19:15 ` PCI target implementation on AMCC PPC CPUs Leonid
2007-09-06 20:15 ` David Hawkins [this message]
2007-09-06 23:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-09-06 23:39 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-06 20:26 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-11 9:13 ` Matthias Fuchs
2007-09-11 17:32 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-11 18:17 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-12 7:17 ` Matthias Fuchs
2007-09-12 16:04 ` David Hawkins
[not found] <46E0B178.00C522.05513@m5-81.163.com>
2007-09-07 2:13 ` Leonid
2007-09-07 2:34 ` David Hawkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E05FFD.3020605@ovro.caltech.edu \
--to=dwh@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=Leonid@a-k-a.net \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.