From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Justin Schoeman <justin@expertron.co.za>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:43:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter
Message-Id: <46E10F4F.5030104@expertron.co.za>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <46D52904.4040809@businessecurity.com>
In-Reply-To: <46D52904.4040809@businessecurity.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Is quantum not perhaps a bit high?  Try setting it lower, and see what=20
happens?

-justin

On 2007-08-29 08:06, Martin Bj=F6rnsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me=
 results I
> expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
>=20
> 1:10 TCP ACKs                       (prio 0)
> 1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001  (prio 1)
> 1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 10000  (prio 2)
> 1:40 Default                        (prio 3)
>=20
> ceil and rate parameters are the same for all 4 classes (rate is 1000kbit=
 and ceil is
> 55000kbit).
>=20
> Then I start 2 TCP flows on src/dst ports 10000 and 10001. The packets se=
em to be
> correctly classified by the filter (I get hits on classes 10, 20 and 30).
>=20
> The problem is that I get the same throughput on both TCP flows. Shouldn'=
t I get about
> 1000kbit through class 30 and much more through class 20 since it has hig=
her priority?
>=20
>=20
> Here's my setup script:
>=20
> #!/bin/sh
> /bin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 40=20
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc