From: David Acker <dacker@roinet.com>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e100 on systems that have cache incoherent DMA
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:11:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E847E9.4010601@roinet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E7CDD5.3060306@katalix.com>
James Chapman wrote:
> David Acker wrote:
>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> pktgen outputs for the various cases modified/unmodified[/others?]
>>> would be nice, if you have a spot of time.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>
>> I am not familiar with pktgen but I seem to have it working for a
>> simple test.
>> I edited the 1-1 example from
>> ftp://robur.slu.se/pub/Linux/net-development/pktgen-testing/examples/
>> . The results with and without the patch are below.
>
> It looks like you ran pktgen on the embedded system, which exercised
> only the transmit path. Auke indicated that the lockup was in the RU.
> Have you run pktgen on a test system to fire packets at the embedded
> system at max rate? Also test what happens when you fire packets in both
> directions simultaneously.
>
It appears that running pktgen between my pc and the embedded device at the same time eventually hangs the RU. I will
be looking into this failure in detail and report back when I know more. Thanks for bearing with me on this!
-Ack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-12 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-31 20:54 [PATCH] Fix e100 on systems that have cache incoherent DMA David Acker
2007-09-04 17:02 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-07 16:31 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-07 20:41 ` David Acker
2007-09-07 21:03 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-07 21:18 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-07 23:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-11 20:54 ` David Acker
2007-09-12 11:30 ` James Chapman
2007-09-12 20:11 ` David Acker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-02 13:27 David Acker
2007-11-02 16:05 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-02 16:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-06 17:01 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-08 18:17 Auke Kok
2007-11-28 19:12 ` David Acker
2007-11-28 19:21 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-28 19:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-28 19:50 ` David Acker
2008-06-18 18:54 ` Anders Grafström
2008-06-18 19:16 ` David Acker
2008-06-19 12:38 ` Anders Grafström
2008-07-01 8:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-01 9:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-07-01 18:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-02 17:36 ` Anders Grafström
2008-07-02 17:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-01 21:35 ` David Acker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E847E9.4010601@roinet.com \
--to=dacker@roinet.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfeldma@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.