From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] spontaneous disconnect with "usb-storage: implement autosuspend"
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:33:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E8A18C.8080607@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070912234016.GA455@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
>
> There are many regressions right now, _ONLY_ if you enable
> CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND. If you disable that, your problems will go away,
> right?
..
> Oh, and currently no distro will enable this option due to the hardware
> problems, so the only people that could get hit by this are those who
> build their own kernels, and they can easily disable the option.
Ubuntu has CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=y
There are probably lots of other distros that use it as well.
This new behaviour (failed operation of USB flash keys) is a *new* regression
in 2.6.23, and we still have time to fix it by either reverting the changed
functionality, or by changing the code to default OFF.
Here's my patch for 2.6.23-rc6+ :
Fix USB Storage failures.
Signed-Off-By: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
---
--- linux/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c.orig 2007-09-11 11:52:14.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c 2007-09-12 18:18:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@
.pre_reset = storage_pre_reset,
.post_reset = storage_post_reset,
.id_table = storage_usb_ids,
- .supports_autosuspend = 1,
+ .supports_autosuspend = 0,
};
static int __init usb_stor_init(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-13 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-14 11:15 spontaneous disconnect with "usb-storage: implement autosuspend" Paolo Ornati
2007-08-14 13:30 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2007-08-14 13:47 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-14 15:46 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-14 16:38 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-14 18:33 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-14 19:02 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-09-12 22:14 ` Mark Lord
2007-09-12 23:40 ` Greg KH
2007-09-13 2:29 ` Mark Lord
2007-09-13 2:33 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2007-09-13 9:40 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E8A18C.8080607@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.