All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E97AFF.30202@pvv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E953D7.5070305@gmail.com>

Resending, as my first attempts contained HTML and was blocked...

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jon Ivar Rykkelid wrote:
>   
>> Thanks for the suggestion, but sata_nv is not built modular in my
>> current kernel, so "no can do" at the moment
>> (However, if some expert REALLY thinks this will fix things, I will
>> CERTAINLY recompile and give it a go)
>>     
>
> Passing "sata_nv.adma=0" as kernel boot parameter will do the trick.
>
>   
Ahh, silly me... Of course!
Ooops, I just got back, and verified: I actually have sata_nv running as 
a module after all on this server... My bad.
I fixed /etc/modprobe.conf to include the following two lines:
"
alias scsi_hostadapter sata_nv
options sata_nv adma=0
...
"

I then ran "mkinitrd" (to ensure that the latest options from 
modprobe.conf were included) in the initrd-image that I load at boot.

- Do you guys think this is worth a try? Anyway, I have rebooted now, so 
I'll test it for a few days and let you know - We'll just have to wait 
and see...
Do you think I should re-enable SMART to provoke a failure, or would 
that be to tempt fate too much? (For now I have not re-enabled SMART)

PS: Is there any way of testing / verifying that sata_nv is now running 
with this option? - I am pretty sure I have done it correctly, but I 
would still like to confirm that the proper option has been passed if 
possible.

Thanks
Jon Ivar


  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-13 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-13  7:46 sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 14:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 15:05   ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 15:14     ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-13 18:01       ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid [this message]
2007-09-13 19:26         ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 19:54           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 21:15             ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14  0:37             ` Robert Hancock
2007-09-14 12:10               ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 13:29         ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-14 14:17           ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 14:25             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 14:39               ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]                 ` <46EAAA9A.1020903@pvv.org>
2007-09-14 15:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 18:38                     ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 20:24                       ` auxsvr
2007-09-14 20:35             ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15  7:12               ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-15 10:14                 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15 14:47                   ` John Stoffel
2007-09-15 19:29                     ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
     [not found]                 ` <46EBA82C.6050000@pvv.org>
2007-09-15 11:30                   ` Prakash Punnoor
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-13  7:18 Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13  9:16 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46E97AFF.30202@pvv.org \
    --to=jonry@pvv.org \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.