From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Walrond Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:43:35 +0000 Subject: Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Message-Id: <46EA1F87.1000905@walrond.org> List-Id: References: <46E7CF5F.3090909@walrond.org> In-Reply-To: <46E7CF5F.3090909@walrond.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Walrond > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:08 +0100 > >> So, Sun really _don't_ give a damn about gnu/linux on sparc64. > > That is a gross mischaracterization of the situation, don't > say this, it isn't true at all. > > I have a full rack of Niagara systems that proves that Sun > cares to some extent. I get early hardware access and > documentation access, plus engineers to talk to and ask > questions of. > With all due respect to your incredible efforts, this amounts to crumbs from their table. When, a multi-billion dollar company allocate ZERO development personnel to support their flagship platform on gnu/linux, I believe the reality of the situation is self evident. > > I know what you are after, and it doesn't happen overnight. So don't Indeed; just perhaps a transcript of this thread will end up on an influential desk, and just maybe they will understand the absurdity of the situation. For myself; I had no idea I was so transparent ;) > be spastic and just whine as the only possible effect that will have > is to scare them off and put Sun in reverse gear instead of continuing > forward. > I'll not bite on the first part; If you reread the thread I think you'd have to agree that 'spastic whining' is "a gross mischaracterization of the situation". As to the second part; Sun are certainly 'bigger' than that. Andrew Walrond