From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
Subject: Re: Network Namespace status
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:03:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EA244C.1050702@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m18x7a5qif.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Looking into my patch queue I have:
> 5 patches for cleaning up and making a per network namespace loopback device.
> 4 patches for making rtnetlink message processing per network namespace
> 1 patch for making AF_UNIX per network namespace
> 1 patch for making AF_PACKET per network namespace
>
> The ipv4 part of my patchset is currently working but it needs some
> more cleanup and reordering of patches before it is ready to go anywhere.
> Nothing has been done for ipv6, but the changes should very much parallel
> ipv4.
>
> The other protocols I haven't even looked at yet.
>
Hi Eric,
can you send me your current AF_PACKET patch? I just want to update our
recent post of the CAN (controller area network) subsystem (AF_CAN)
which is (in some parts) similar to AF_PACKET. So i can take a look on
it to provide the latest technique in the next post ...
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-14 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-13 19:12 Network Namespace status Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-13 19:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-14 6:03 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2007-09-14 9:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-16 22:36 ` David Miller
2007-09-16 23:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-15 15:31 Network namespace status Daniel Lezcano
2008-08-22 7:55 Eelco Chaudron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46EA244C.1050702@hartkopp.net \
--to=oliver@hartkopp.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urs@isnogud.escape.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.