From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.genesi-usa.com (mithrandir.softwarenexus.net [66.98.186.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1E4DDE1D for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:02:50 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46EAB10A.7070204@genesi-usa.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:04:26 +0100 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [NEWBIE] Interrupt-problem mpc5200 References: <20070906133050.GE11807@sfrouter> <20070911124154.GI11807@sfrouter> <20070911182811.GA3582@sfrouter> <46EA8CD7.2050304@genesi-usa.com> <46EAA65E.5080006@genesi-usa.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "S. Fricke" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > > No, they are explicitly numbered. Are you looking at the 5200 or the > 5200B user manual? MPC5200B User's Manual, Rev. 1.3 (MPC5200BUM.pdf) > In my copy, on page 7-17, I see this: Ah! 7-20 here. Do we have different revisions of the manual, perhaps? :) PSa0 in > peripheral interrupt 0 (l2=0), PSa23 is peripheral interrupt #23 > (l2=23) > > Bits Name > 8 PSa23 BestCom So, the numbering of the interrupts is not derived from anything but the "Name" field in those tables? 0 1 3 would be Slice Timer 0, 1 0 3 would be Slice Timer 1 (main, interrupt 0, we always use 3 on Efika for some reason) and 1 9 3 would be TMR0? PCI control and initiator interrupts would be 2 (8,9,10) 3? Well, this certainly makes a lot more sense, at least in terms of deriving the numbers, however it looks like it's a fairly nonsensical numbering system to be fair. -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations