All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: L F <lfabio.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e1000 driver and samba
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:59:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EAF644.1040006@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <780b6f780709141140l1fd586c9p2aa8efe6ed803d38@mail.gmail.com>

L F wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote:
>> this slowness might have been masking the issue
> That is possible. However, it worked for upwards of twelve months
> without an error.
> 
>> I have not yet seen other reports of this issue, and it would be interesting to
>> see if the stack or driver is seeing errors. Please post `ethtool -S eth0` after
>> the samba connection resets or fails.
> If you look for it on the Realtek cards, there had been sporadic
> issues up to late 2005. The solution posted universally was 'change
> card'.
> 
> I include the content of ethtool -S as requested:
> beehive:~# ethtool -S eth4
> NIC statistics:
>      rx_packets: 43538709
>      tx_packets: 68726231
>      rx_bytes: 34124849453
>      tx_bytes: 74817483835
>      rx_broadcast: 20891
>      tx_broadcast: 8941
>      rx_multicast: 459
>      tx_multicast: 0
>      rx_errors: 0
>      tx_errors: 0
>      tx_dropped: 0
>      multicast: 459
>      collisions: 0
>      rx_length_errors: 0
>      rx_over_errors: 0
>      rx_crc_errors: 0
>      rx_frame_errors: 0
>      rx_no_buffer_count: 0
>      rx_missed_errors: 0
>      tx_aborted_errors: 0
>      tx_carrier_errors: 0
>      tx_fifo_errors: 0
>      tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
>      tx_window_errors: 0
>      tx_abort_late_coll: 0
>      tx_deferred_ok: 486
>      tx_single_coll_ok: 0
>      tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
>      tx_timeout_count: 0
>      tx_restart_queue: 0
>      rx_long_length_errors: 0
>      rx_short_length_errors: 0
>      rx_align_errors: 0
>      tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
>      tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
>      rx_flow_control_xon: 488
>      rx_flow_control_xoff: 488
>      tx_flow_control_xon: 0
>      tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
>      rx_long_byte_count: 34124849453
>      rx_csum_offload_good: 43449333
>      rx_csum_offload_errors: 0
>      rx_header_split: 0
>      alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0
>      tx_smbus: 0
>      rx_smbus: 0
>      dropped_smbus: 0
> 
> I am no expert, but I do not see anything that obviously points to an
> issue there.
> Now, something I did not mention before, though it was clearly evident
> from context, is that the errors ONLY occur on samba WRITE. I can read
> hundreds of GBs of data without error.

can you describe your setup a bit more in detail? you're writing from a linux 
client to a windows smb server? or even to a linux server? which end sees the 
connection drop? the samba server? the samba linux client?

Auke

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-14 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-14  2:04 e1000 driver and samba L F
2007-09-14 17:18 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-14 18:40   ` L F
2007-09-14 20:59     ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-09-15  0:37       ` L F
2007-09-15  5:09         ` Bill Fink
2007-09-15 12:27           ` L F
2007-09-15 12:44             ` L F
2007-09-15 17:44       ` James Chapman
2007-09-15 19:07         ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-16  4:06           ` L F
2007-09-16  5:04             ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-17 16:42               ` L F
2007-09-17 17:02                 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-17 18:58                   ` L F
2007-09-17 21:01                     ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2007-09-18  6:03                       ` Bill Fink
2007-09-18  7:45                         ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18  8:47                           ` Bill Fink
2007-09-18 13:39                           ` Florian Weimer
2007-09-18 16:32                             ` L F
2007-09-18 17:04                               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2007-09-19 14:53                                 ` L F
2007-09-20  2:51                                   ` Bill Fink
2007-09-21 14:08                                     ` L F
2007-09-20  4:53                                   ` Bill Fink
2007-09-18 16:44                             ` Bill Fink
2007-09-17 18:02               ` Rick Jones
2007-09-17 18:51                 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-16 16:24           ` James Chapman
2007-09-16 20:03             ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-16  4:07         ` L F
2007-09-14 18:26 ` Francois Romieu
2007-09-14 18:41   ` L F
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-20 23:30 Bruce Cole
2007-09-21 14:13 ` L F
2007-09-21 18:21   ` Bruce Cole
2007-09-21 21:49 ` Francois Romieu
2007-09-21 22:01   ` Bruce Cole
2007-09-21 22:41     ` Francois Romieu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46EAF644.1040006@intel.com \
    --to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=lfabio.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.