All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: path priorities on Sun's 6140
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:08:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EBA114.10408@linpro.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66F461DD7EDEEF4AA928FCC80B425B520468B7@c2kp01mail.cucbc.com>

* James Fillman

> I'm running RHEL5 with QLogic HBA's and a Sun 6140 SAN. The host type
> I'm using for my servers is 'Solaris (with DMP)'. This turns AVT
> mode one. For some reason, the two controllers are returning the same
> priority value to my priority call out program (mpath_prio_tpc).

   Try path_grouping_policy group_by_serial?

> Can anyone briefly explain what the mpath_prio_tpc utility does and 
> where these priority values come from?

   It calls out to the supplied SCSI device and returns a different
  integer depending on if the controller is the preferred owner for the
  volume and if it actually is.  The values has changed quite a bit from
  version to version, but if I recall correctly they are in your version:

   Device is a path to the preferred and active controller = 6
   Device is a path to the preferred and inactive controller = 4
   Device is a path to the least preferred and active controller = 3
   Device is a path to the least preferred and inactive controller = 1

   Since you have group_by_prio and they end up in the same path group it
  seems the prio callout doesn't work (you can test this yourself by
  running «mpath_prio_tpc /dev/sdx»).  When I used AVT I set the hosts to
  host type AIX_FO, which seemed to work fine for me at least.  Try that?

   You're also using path_checker readsector0 with AVT which is really
  bad.  Every time multipathd checks a path to the passive controller the
  volume vil move there, which will interrupt I/O for several seconds.
  Use the tur checker instead.

   However, are you _really_ sure you want AVT mode?  Support for RDAC
  mode was recently added to dm-multipath (both a hardware handler and
  a path checker), and using this is normally vastly superior to AVT
  mode.  The Linux kernel itself (partition scan on boot) as well as a
  lot of applications (LVM, mdadm, fdisk, etc.) believe reading from
  block devices is a harmless thing to do.  However with AVT mode this
  I/O will cause a volume to transfer and I/O to be interrupted, and
  paths will fail.  With AVT you won't be able to boot node A in a
  cluster without interrupting the I/O flow of the rest of the nodes, nor
  manage LVM on any node in a cluster without also interrupting I/O
  (unless you've configured LVM to stay away from your multipathed
  devices).

   PS:  If you have I/O failures happening on your hosts when you do
  changes to the storage domains setup, this is due to a mis-feature in
  the 6140 that makes it dim its fibre ports whenever a change is made.
  They said this was done to make all hosts relogin and automatically
  discover new volumes with no manual rescan needed, but the fabric
  relogin interrupts I/O and causes path failures.  But there is hope.  I
  was told yesterday that in the next firmware release we can opt to
  toggle this «feature» off.  Go pester Sun to get it.  ;-)

Regards
-- 
Tore Anderson

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-15  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-14 22:02 path priorities on Sun's 6140 James Fillman
2007-09-15  6:26 ` Eckebrecht von Pappenheim
2007-09-15  9:08 ` Tore Anderson [this message]
2007-09-17 18:17   ` James Fillman
2007-09-17 18:36     ` James Fillman
2007-09-18  7:39       ` Tore Anderson
2007-09-21 22:55         ` James Fillman
2007-09-24  6:47           ` Tore Anderson
2007-09-24 16:56             ` James Fillman
2007-09-18 14:02       ` Hannes Reinecke
2007-09-17  6:21 ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46EBA114.10408@linpro.no \
    --to=tore@linpro.no \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.