From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Account for the slub objects Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:27:31 +0400 Message-ID: <46EF6FD3.6030606@openvz.org> References: <46EE70B4.6060902@openvz.org> <46EE74AF.70105@openvz.org> <1190045301.26982.56.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1190045301.26982.56.camel@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Dave Hansen Cc: Linux Containers , Christoph Lameter List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Dave Hansen wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:35 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> The struct page gets an extra pointer (just like it has with >> the RSS controller) and this pointer points to the array of >> the kmem_container pointers - one for each object stored on >> that page itself. > > Can't these at least be unioned so we don't make it any _worse_ when > both are turned on? Your comment makes me suspect, that you don't look at the patches at all :( They ARE unioned. > -- Dave > >