From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kernel memory accounting container (v4) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:53:06 +0530 Message-ID: <46F3B7AA.2040309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <46F38B67.3020609@openvz.org> Reply-To: balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46F38B67.3020609-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Linux Containers , Christoph Lameter List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Long time ago we decided to start memory control with the > user memory container. Now this container in -mm tree and > I think we can start with (at least discussion of) the > kmem one. > Hi, Pavel, Yes, I remember the entire discussion. Also in the TODO list is an mlock() controller and a virtual memory controller. Just wanted to ensure that they are still in the TODO list. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL