All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Franz <thefranz@comcast.net>
To: Git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: C++ *for Git*
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:49:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F6A73A.3010203@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85zlzdo3ch.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>

To me the methods that an OO class defines is the same thing as an API.  
And you can screw up an API whether it is C++ or C. Both give you the 
same opportunity to screw up the model and create code that needs to be 
re-written.

Paul Franz

David Kastrup wrote:
> "Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@gmail.com> writes:
>
>   
>> On 9/23/07, Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote:
>>     
>>>> Object oriented languages creates black boxes: that's the reason
>>>> why object oriented exsists and also the reason why Linus hates
>>>> it ;-)
>>>>         
>
>   
>>> So please stop with this myth. And don't speak for people, I would
>>> be very surprised that Linus would dislike "black
>>> boxes". Abstractions are good, when used wisely, and I would be
>>> much surprised to see Linus pretend otherwise.
>>>       
>> From a Linus recent thread:
>>
>>     
>>> In other words, the only way to do good, efficient, and system-level
>>> and portable C++ ends up to limit yourself to all the things that
>>> are basically available in C. And limiting your project to C means
>>> that people don't screw that up, and also means that you get a lot
>>> of programmers that do actually understand low-level issues and
>>> don't screw things up with any idiotic "object model" crap.
>>>       
>> Perhaps I have misunderstood, but the idea I got is that for Linus
>> OO brings in more problems than what it tries to fix.
>>     
>
> I read that as OO bringing in more programmers capable of creating
> problems than those capable of fixing them.
>
> It is not the fault of OO in itself, but it is the bottom line that
> counts: if it draws the wrong audience for the wrong reasons, it
> better had great benefits to offset that.  Not quite unsimilar with
> communism: the idea is great in principle, but the idea has no
> built-in self-check.  Capitalism, in contrast, is a distasteful idea
> at its heart, but it is rooted soundly in individual egoism.  Which
> does not make it any less distasteful, but at least it tends to work.
>
>   

-- 

-------------------------------------------

There are seven sins in the world.
     Wealth without work.
     Pleasure without conscience.
     Knowledge without character.
     Commerce without morality.
     Science without humanity.
     Worship without sacrifice.
     Politics without principle.

   -- Mohandas Gandhi

-------------------------------------------

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-23 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-22 10:42 C++ *for Git* Dmitry Kakurin
2007-09-22 11:11 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22 12:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-22 15:23   ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23  4:54     ` Dmitry Kakurin
2007-09-22 15:15 ` Kyle Rose
2007-09-22 18:08   ` Miles Bader
2007-09-22 18:25     ` [OT] " Kyle Rose
2007-09-22 19:11       ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22 22:50       ` Alex Unleashed
2007-09-23  2:09         ` Frank Lichtenheld
2007-09-23  6:25           ` David Brown
2007-09-23  7:23             ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23  9:29               ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23  9:42                 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23  9:50                   ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 10:45                 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-09-23 13:42                   ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 14:23                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-09-23 14:45                       ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 14:37                     ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 15:15                       ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 17:49                       ` Paul Franz [this message]
2007-09-23 16:54                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-23 18:05                       ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 18:30                         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 18:43                           ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 19:11                             ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 21:22                       ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-09-23 21:31                         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 23:10                           ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-09-23 22:25                         ` Reece Dunn
2007-09-24 10:46                           ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-09-22 22:24   ` Martin Langhoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46F6A73A.3010203@comcast.net \
    --to=thefranz@comcast.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.