From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZXzw-0005qA-GJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:24:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZXzu-0005py-Uc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:24:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZXzu-0005pv-OK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:24:10 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZXzu-0006PX-AC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:24:10 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IZXxU-0001Op-4y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:21:40 +0000 Received: from d83-190-180-66.cust.tele2.it ([83.190.180.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:21:40 +0000 Received: from lorenzo.campedelli by d83-190-180-66.cust.tele2.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:21:40 +0000 From: Lorenzo Campedelli Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:17:42 +0200 Message-ID: <46F6C9E6.8080503@tele2.it> References: <219e947f0709221443l494e4c46w6efafce989dbb867@mail.gmail.com> <46F68C56.8000408@tele2.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] vvfat mbr fixes Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote: > >> I was concerned by having this handling outside of a proper place (i.e. >> block-vvfat.c), but if we want to leave it there, wouldn't it be better >> to just handle cases which would otherwise fail, and just try to fix the >> "fat:" format? > > I don't like that option, since it special-cases vvfat to much. > > Ciao, > Dscho > > > > I agree the fix is ugly, otoh the problem is also a special case... I don't see a clean way of fixing this, the code in block.c needs to know how to handle a vvfat specific filename format. I'll keep my "works for me" patch waiting for some better fix. Thanks for your time. Lorenzo