From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <46F777EE.3060100@domain.hid>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:40:14 +0200
From: Benjamin ZORES <benjamin.zores@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Adeos PowerPC patch differences
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Hello Philippe (or any that can provide me with some infos),

I've seen you've commited a patch for Adeos on upcoming 2.6.23
based on DENX tree.

Can you tell me what are the main differences between the Adeos 1.7
and 2.0 series from a functionnal point of view ?
Is Xenomai 2.4-rc3 supposed to work as good on both series ?
And is the DENX patch specific to DENX tree or can it be applied/used
from vanilla kernel tree ?

Regards,

Ben