From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46F7859C.8080505@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:38:36 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <61839.194.114.62.68.1187258167.squirrel@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0708160300r79a717ebt7541c1d6e3da6687@domain.hid> <11886.194.114.62.68.1187258877.squirrel@domain.hid> <18116.9932.592597.831501@domain.hid> <56493.194.114.62.68.1187265227.squirrel@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0708160639k555fbb48p98a13892e30e5b02@domain.hid> <21067.194.114.62.68.1187272557.squirrel@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0708160701w17dcf324jb9cb31843d69ca60@domain.hid> <4760.194.114.62.68.1187274071.squirrel@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0708160731k5eefd6b2i417b05b6d329e481@domain.hid> <23820.194.114.62.37.1190188945.squirrel@domain.hid> <46F0E63F.7010100@domain.hid> <10620.194.114.62.68.1190622767.squirrel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <10620.194.114.62.68.1190622767.squirrel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] latency problems List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nadym Salem Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Nadym Salem schrieb: > On Wed, September 19, 2007 11:05, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Nadym Salem schrieb: >>> On Thu, August 16, 2007 16:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> On 8/16/07, Nadym Salem wrote: >>>>> On Thu, August 16, 2007 16:01, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>>>> Aha, this probably means that your chipset is not supporte, could you >>>>>> run lspci and send us the output ? >>>>> it is attached. >>>> Could you try to apply the attached patch to xenomai sources ? You >>>> will then have to recompile your xenomai-patched kernel. >>> Hmm, I have a new (quite old) machine now and installed Xenomai 2.3.3, >>> having the same problem as before. The SMI workaround doesn't appear in >>> the kernel log at all. Last time you gave me a "patch" for smi.c after >>> which the system at least tried to start the smi workaround. Is there >>> another possibility like that for my other machine ? I attached the >>> output >>> of lspci. >>> tx in advance, >>> greets, Nadym >>> PS: Could it be, that this machine doesn't have SMIs at all ? >> For sure, but there can also be other hardware-related latency killers. >> So far the SMI workaround only deals with Intel chipsets (because there >> are known knobs thanks to the chipset manual). >> I can't join this party for the next days, but I would like to throw in >> the question if you already tried to analyse the latency spot with the >> I-pipe tracer (see Xenomai wiki). That may either underline that it is >> outside the software's scope (arbitrary delays in unrelated kernel >> functions) or point to a potential (but less likely) software issue. > > In advice of Gilles, I did a longterm test (from friday evening until this > morning) on two machines. One being a slower, older one, the other being a > core2duo. Both having the same latency problems. The Logfiles are > attached. Maybe due to my work e-mail interface, I'm having troubles opening those tars. Do they now contain an I-pipe tracer output or only the testsuite output like in the previous posting? In case of the latter please check [1]. Jan [1] http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/I-pipe:Tracer -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux