From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46F8A992.2070500@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:24:18 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <899865CA54E4444DAF2E3639C04C5F4805ED19@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <899865CA54E4444DAF2E3639C04C5F4805ED19@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5F137AF0FC3F344D88F25964" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Fast Context Switch Extension for ARM Linux List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Cochran Cc: xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5F137AF0FC3F344D88F25964 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Richard Cochran wrote: >> -----Original Message----- From: Gilles Chanteperdrix >=20 >> The feature was already dropped, it is deprecated in ARMv6. >=20 > Doesn't ARMv6 have a new cache design based on physical addresses? >=20 > I thought I saw this somewhere... Just grabbed this: "Version 6 now supports physically tagged caches, reducing software overhead on context switches." [http://www.simplemachines.it/doc/ARMv6_Architecture.pdf] But does this mean this layout is optional or mandatory for ARMv6 integrators? Jan --------------enig5F137AF0FC3F344D88F25964 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG+KmTniDOoMHTA+kRAkxYAJ4ghoM1ueZPNwFNEgEHs62+Bb8zkgCZAaZ1 WEITU0byFOA93CWNfVwREFk= =ZN86 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5F137AF0FC3F344D88F25964--