From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] allow "unlimited" limit value. Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:14:53 +0400 Message-ID: <46F925ED.20303@openvz.org> References: <20070925193900.1af6d871.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <46F8E7AE.2090309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070925202954.4e477564.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <46F8F6FE.7040006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <46F907CE.1060807@openvz.org> <46F90DCA.5030209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <46F90E48.6080603@openvz.org> <20070926000510.7d956db8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070926000510.7d956db8.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, menage-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:34:00 +0400 > Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> Well, no container may have the ULLMAX (or what is it?) bytes >> touched/allocated :) So I don't see any need in a special value. >> > Then, ULLMAX is default value of "not configured cgroup-resource-counter". > > For make things clear for people(including not-hacker-users), > can we have some definition as following ? > -- > #define RES_COUNTER_INIFINITY (~0ULL) > or some nice name Why do we need this at all? We can simply push -1 there and be happy. > Thanks, > -Kame >