From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <46FA1F22.6080602@domain.hid>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:58:10 +0200
From: Benjamin ZORES <benjamin.zores@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <46F777EE.3060100@domain.hid>	<1190748335.22323.11.camel@domain.hid>
	<46FA1B3C.104@domain.hid> <46FA1DC7.3040504@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <46FA1DC7.3040504@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Adeos PowerPC patch differences
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Benjamin ZORES wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> Yes. I have tested 2.6.22-DENX over two Freescale boards, namely 
>>> mpc52xx
>>> and mpc8548, using this very same setup. Btw, you will need to pick
>>> 2.0-01 which landed today in the repo, since I fixed a couple of issues
>>> (one being serious) there.
>>>   
>> Thanks for the info about 2.0 issue.
>>>> And is the DENX patch specific to DENX tree or can it be applied/used
>>>> from vanilla kernel tree ?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>> It should apply to the vanilla tree without too much fuss, but the
>>> reference tree for the I-pipe/powerpc work is the DENX one, AFAIC.
>>>
>>>   
>>
>> FYI, Adeos 2.0 / Xenomai 2.4 works fine on my PowerPC boards too.
>> BTW, 2.6.23-rc5 patch does not apply "as it" on -rc7 and -rc8
>> (for ppc64 part at least).
>
> Because head_4xx.S has been renamed to head_40x.S in 
> arch/powerpc/kernel recently :-(.
>
> Wolfgang.
>
No, it was due to changes in code in time.c and process.c iirc.

Ben