From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46FA26ED.4070505@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:31:25 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46F9167F.20008@domain.hid> <1190756271.26427.0.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1190756271.26427.0.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Non-APIC setup broken for 2.4-SVN? List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: rpm@xenomai.org Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 16:09 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> to make it short has anyone or could anyone try latest SVN over kernel >> 2.6.20 (i-pipe for 2.6.22 is instable) _without_ LAPIC? It works for me, >> but exposes milliseconds of latencies. Same setup with LAPIC enabled is >> fine and obviously stable. Before digging into this (time is short >> anyway), I would like to exclude problems of my notebook hardware. >> > > Not confirmed here. Everything looks ok. Yes, I found a second box working fine with a comparable (though not identical) config. I suspect some hw issue of my notebook now, but I will try to look into this a bit deeper once time permits. More important is to understand and fix the consistent 2.6.22 issues I see. Only works in qemu for me, all real i386 boxes lock up sooner or later. :-/ Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux