From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46FA2804.3060602@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:36:04 +0200 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46F777EE.3060100@domain.hid> <1190748335.22323.11.camel@domain.hid> <46FA1B3C.104@domain.hid> <46FA1DC7.3040504@domain.hid> <46FA1F22.6080602@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <46FA1F22.6080602@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Adeos PowerPC patch differences List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Benjamin ZORES Cc: xenomai-core Benjamin ZORES wrote: > Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Benjamin ZORES wrote: >>> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>>> Yes. I have tested 2.6.22-DENX over two Freescale boards, namely >>>> mpc52xx >>>> and mpc8548, using this very same setup. Btw, you will need to pick >>>> 2.0-01 which landed today in the repo, since I fixed a couple of issues >>>> (one being serious) there. >>>> >>> Thanks for the info about 2.0 issue. >>>>> And is the DENX patch specific to DENX tree or can it be applied/used >>>>> from vanilla kernel tree ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> It should apply to the vanilla tree without too much fuss, but the >>>> reference tree for the I-pipe/powerpc work is the DENX one, AFAIC. >>>> >>>> >>> FYI, Adeos 2.0 / Xenomai 2.4 works fine on my PowerPC boards too. >>> BTW, 2.6.23-rc5 patch does not apply "as it" on -rc7 and -rc8 >>> (for ppc64 part at least). >> Because head_4xx.S has been renamed to head_40x.S in >> arch/powerpc/kernel recently :-(. >> >> Wolfgang. >> > No, it was due to changes in code in time.c and process.c iirc. I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-rc5-powerpc-DENX-2.0-01.patch to the 2.6.23-rc7 version of linux-2.6-denx. Seems you are using the official kernel linux-2.6 tree. Wolfgang.