From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Nelson Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add network namespace clone & unshare support. Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:53:58 +1000 Message-ID: <46FC50A6.1040302@au1.ibm.com> References: <46FB6F1E.8070105@fr.ibm.com> <20070927.124552.69400277.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, David Miller List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > David Miller writes: > >> Eric, pick an appropriate new non-conflicting number NOW. > > Done. My apologies for the confusion. I thought the > way Cedric and the IBM guys were testing someone would have > shouted at me long before now. Sorry Eric, that was me that should have been shouting at you. It got lost because I modified the patches I extracted from your git tree so they would apply to -mm, leaving me thinking there were no extra patches... Further apologies for dropping the ball - it won't happen again. Mark. > >> This adds unnecessary extra work for Andrew Morton, which he has >> enough of already. > > Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code > being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So > I copied Andrew to give him a heads up. > > I will gladly do what I can, to help. Working against 3 trees > development at the moment is a bit of a development challenge. > > Eric > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers >