From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cedric Le Goater Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add network namespace clone & unshare support. Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:56:04 +0200 Message-ID: <46FCEBD4.1060802@fr.ibm.com> References: <46FB6F1E.8070105@fr.ibm.com> <20070927.124552.69400277.davem@davemloft.net> <46FCC56D.9050600@fr.ibm.com> <20070928022842.8f408d71.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070928022842.8f408d71.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , David Miller , containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:13 +0200 Cedric Le Goater wrote: > >>> Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code >>> being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So >>> I copied Andrew to give him a heads up. >> here's a suggestion, >> >> we could keep the net namespace unshare patch out of david's tree, >> let andrew merge and release a new -mm and, then, send the net namespace >> unshare patch to andrew. that should keep nsproxy out of the andrew's >> merge challenge. But david's tree will miss the unshare part for a while. > > This patch only generates two rejects against the current -mm poop pile. > That's insignificant. We don't need to do anything special to merge a > little patch like this one. Thanks Andrew. C.