From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: netns49 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:32:47 +0200 Message-ID: <46FD1E9F.4000200@fr.ibm.com> References: <46FD1A3B.3060306@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Daniel Lezcano writes: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> I noticed that you have a netns49 in your tree. Shall we use it ? > > I haven't pulled in your timewait socket work as it looked incomplete > but I should have removed the unnecessary tests for &init_net that > you noticed in your other patchset. I think Denis and I we reached a complete patch posted a couple of hours ago. Finally I didn't put the exit method in the inet_timewait_sock.c file but I added it to the tcp.c file. There is a comment about that in the header of the patch.