From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add notification about some major slab events Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:33:27 +0530 Message-ID: <4700F01F.2090006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <46F91841.9070708@openvz.org> <46F91898.5060400@openvz.org> <4700E03B.6000102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4700E477.2060607@openvz.org> <4700E8F2.7000206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4700EEAE.1090208@openvz.org> Reply-To: balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4700EEAE.1090208-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Linux Containers , Christoph Lameter List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Balbir Singh wrote: >> Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>>> harsh, hard to review since the definition of the above function >>>> is not known. >>> What do you mean by "not known"? I is declared above :) >>> >> I meant, we only know the stub weak functions. Does slub_*_notify >> fail only on fatal errors? If not, then the failure might be > > It depends on the listener of the event when to fail. The slub > notification mechanism is not the accounting at all it just > sends notifications. > OK. My concern is that a listener can fail allocation of a slub object. >> unfair. >> > -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL