From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Setup the control group Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:46:26 +0530 Message-ID: <4701013A.3010307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <46F91841.9070708@openvz.org> <46F91A1E.2060303@openvz.org> <4700FAAC.2050004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4700FB72.5070409@openvz.org> Reply-To: balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4700FB72.5070409-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Linux Containers , Christoph Lameter List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> Could we make the user interface similar to the one in the memory >> controller please! It would make it easier for users to configure >> and control both. > > Do you mean by merging the similar code or by making them look like > the same? If the second, than can you point at least one difference > except for "usage" vs "usage_in_bytes" (and similar) naming? > I meant similar naming, it makes it is easier if the naming convention is the same. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL