All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:37:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47021F83.4070609@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710021121.36443.ak@suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007 11:17:02 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> This is also a good time to warn about the fact that we're doing the x86 
>>> merge very soon (as in the next day or two) after 2.6.23 is out, so if you 
>>> have pending patches for the next series that touch arch/i386 or x86-64, 
>>> you should get in touch with Thomas Gleixner and Ingo Molnar, who are the 
>>> keepers of the merge scripts, and will help you prepare..
> 
> 
> Yes I have ~100 patches for arch/x86_64, arch/i386
> 
> Should I just drop them?

Why don't you work with Thomas and Ingo to make sure everything is in 
sync and prepped for 2.6.24?

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-02 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710012029400.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org >
2007-10-02  3:41 ` Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02  9:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-02  9:21     ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-02 10:37       ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-10-02 10:48         ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-02 11:05           ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-02 14:07             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 14:23               ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-02 14:31                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 14:54                   ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-02 14:58                   ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-02 15:24                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-02 15:27                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 15:30                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-02 15:40                       ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-02 12:04       ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-02 20:12     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-02 20:11       ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-02 20:31         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-02 20:32         ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-03  3:53     ` Eric St-Laurent
2007-10-02 12:07   ` Mel Gorman
2007-10-02 12:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 17:21       ` Mel Gorman
2007-10-02 22:09         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-03  0:37           ` Mel Gorman
2007-10-03  8:21             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 12:51               ` Mel Gorman
2007-10-22 15:56                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03  8:19         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 14:44   ` John Stoffel
2007-10-02 15:03     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 15:45     ` John Stoffel
2007-10-02 22:13     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-02 22:44   ` Willy Tarreau
2007-10-02 22:51   ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-10-02 23:00     ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-05  5:41       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-05  5:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-05  6:11       ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-05  8:32         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-07 23:44           ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-10-02 23:07   ` Diego Calleja
2007-10-02 23:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-03 15:28       ` Diego Calleja
2007-10-03  8:46   ` [bug] crash when reading /proc/mounts (was: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..) Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03  8:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03  9:12       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03  9:23         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 13:34     ` Al Viro
2007-10-03 14:08       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 14:26         ` Al Viro
2007-10-03 15:12           ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-03 15:11     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-03 15:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 16:07         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-03 15:47       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-03 15:49         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 16:07           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03 15:51       ` Alan Cox
2007-10-03 16:09         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-03 16:25           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-03 17:07             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-04 14:12       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-04 15:08         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-10-03 14:21   ` Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series Timo Jantunen
2007-10-03 19:07   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03 19:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-04 11:55   ` [patch] net, 9p: build fix with !CONFIG_SYSCTL Ingo Molnar
2007-10-04 17:05   ` [BUG] Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and MAX_ARG_PAGES Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2007-10-04 17:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-04 20:47       ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2007-10-04 21:58       ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2007-10-04 17:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-04 20:44       ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2007-10-04 21:21         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-04 22:27           ` Paul Mackerras
2007-10-05  0:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-05  3:22               ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2007-10-05  7:43                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-04 21:50     ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-10-04 21:54       ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2007-10-06  8:29     ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2007-10-06 11:29       ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2007-10-06 17:36     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47021F83.4070609@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.