From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: lm@bitmover.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net,
wscott@bitmover.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:48:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4702766E.80202@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071002154137.GD17418@bitmover.com>
Larry McVoy wrote:
> Interesting data point. My test case is like this:
>
> server
> bind
> listen
> while (newsock = accept...)
> transfer()
>
> client
> connect
> transfer
>
> If the server side is the source of the data, i.e, it's transfer is a
> write loop, then I get the bad behaviour. If I switch them so the data
> flows in the other direction, then it works, I go from about 14K pkt/sec
> to 43K pkt/sec.
>
> Can anyone else reproduce this? I can extract the test case from lmbench
> so it is standalone but I suspect that any test case will do it. I'll
> try with the one that John sent. Yup, s/read/write/ and s/write/read/
> in his two files at the appropriate places and I get exactly the same
> behaviour.
>
> So is this a bug or intentional?
>
I have a more complex configuration & application, but I don't see this
problem in
my testing. Using e1000 nics and modern hardware I can set up a connection
between two machines and run 800+Mbps in both directions, or near line speed
in one direction if the other direction is mostly silent.
I am purposefully setting the socket send/rx buffers, as well has
twiddling with
the tcp and netdev related tunables. If you want, I can email these
tweaks to you.
NICs and busses have a huge impact on performance, so make sure those
are good.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-02 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070929142517.EC6AB5FB21@work.bitmover.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709290914410.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20070929172639.GB7037@bitmover.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709291050200.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-02 0:59 ` tcp bw in 2.6 Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 2:20 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 3:50 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 4:23 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:06 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 17:14 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 17:20 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:01 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 18:40 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:47 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 21:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-03 7:19 ` Bill Fink
2007-10-02 10:52 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-02 15:09 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:41 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:25 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:49 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-15 12:40 ` Daniel Schaffrath
2007-10-15 15:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 16:48 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:16 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 21:26 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:47 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 22:17 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 22:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 22:36 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 22:59 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-03 8:02 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 16:48 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2007-10-02 17:11 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:18 ` Ben Greear
2007-10-02 17:21 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 18:35 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:29 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 19:07 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 20:31 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 19:33 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:53 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 20:14 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 20:40 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:42 ` Wayne Scott
2007-10-02 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:53 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 20:44 ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-02 21:21 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:13 ` Pekka Pietikainen
2007-10-03 21:23 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:50 ` Pekka Pietikainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4702766E.80202@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wscott@bitmover.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.