From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Denis V. Lunev" Subject: Re: [patch 0/1][NETNS49] Make af_unix autobind per namespace Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:11:57 +0400 Message-ID: <47034ECD.6080502@sw.ru> References: <20071002151846.827206013@mai.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, den-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, benjamin.thery-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Daniel Lezcano writes: > >> The following patch change autobind fonction to use the ordernum >> from the network namespace instead of using the local static variable. > > Why do we care? > Information leak? > Some application is expecting a predictable autobind value? > > Just skimming the code it looks like it will work correctly without > this. I also do not see a need for this :) Regards, Den