All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Avantika Mathur <mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:25:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4703E5B1.7090903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071003183718.GM5578@schatzie.adilger.int>



Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 03, 2007  15:30 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> +	if (block_group == sbi->s_gdb_count - 1) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Even though mke2fs always initialize first and last group
>> +		 * if some other tool enabled the EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT we 
>> need
>> +		 * to make sure we calculate the right free blocks
>> +		 */
>> +		free_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) -
>> +				le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
>> +				(EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * 
>> sbi->s_groups_count) -
>> +				bit_max;
> 
> Did you verify that subtracting s_first_data_block is indeed the right
> thing to do.  I _think_ yes, but I didn't look at it very closely when
> I wrote it late last night.
> 

yes s_first_data_block is always decremented to find total number of blocks occupied by the 
reset of the group. But now looking at it again i guess i need to have 

EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) *  sbi->s_groups_count

as

EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) *  (sbi->s_groups_count -1 )


Also for the last group i need to mark_end_bitmap_end from a lower value. 

if ( last_group) {
group_block = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) - e32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
              EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * (sbi->s_groups_count - 1)

} else {
 group_block = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)

}


free_blocks = group_block - bit_max


mark_bitmap_end(group_block, ...)


-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-03 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-03 10:00 update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-03 18:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-10-03 18:55   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2007-10-03 19:04     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-04  0:44       ` Mingming Cao
2007-10-05 13:26 ` Valerie Clement
2007-10-05 15:14   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4703E5B1.7090903@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.