From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Intel VMDq & Xen Platform Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:50:18 +0530 Message-ID: <4704A242.9010007@netxen.com> References: <46FA3C9F.1030208@netxen.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46FA3C9F.1030208@netxen.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jambunathan K Cc: xen-devel , Sanjeev Jorapur List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org I am reposting this for some insights or comments. I believe the changes would spawn bridge-utils and some parts of netfront and netback. If I have an in principle nod from the Xen community I am interested in spending sometime on this featurelet and churn out the details. Jambunathan K. Jambunathan K wrote: > Intel has a whitepaper on support for "Virtual Machine Device Queues" on their > 82575 Gb adapters. There is a reference to improved figures in VMWare environment. > > http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/isn/downloads/virtualization/pdfs/07-643_VMDq_WP_r01.pdf > >>>From the looks of it, the technology seems to be applicable to Xen's Split Drivers. > > Can someone comment on the VMDq technology on Xen platform in terms of Xen's > readiness. > > (I am posting this to Xen-Uses as well as the post might be of generic interest.) > > Jambunathan K. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >