From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Kryger Subject: Re: [NFS] nfs write problems Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:12:20 -0400 Message-ID: <47054924.2040003@panix.com> References: <4702A279.3080001@panix.com> <1191370059.6707.38.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <47036D3F.8070904@panix.com> <20071003133118.GP21675@fieldses.org> Reply-To: For users of Fedora Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: For users of Fedora , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Trond Myklebust To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071003133118.GP21675@fieldses.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Interesting development that changes the suspect component. On the suggestion of a colleague I setup samba and mounted the same location via CIFS. I am getting the same results the files are corrupted if they are written via samba or NFS. Now, I'm really confused. I guess I'll try swapping out the SCSI HBA. Thanks Bob J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:21:51AM -0400, Bob Kryger wrote: > >> Trond Myklebust wrote: >> >>> Feel free to describe your test in a bit more detail. Without more >>> information, we obviously can't rule out the existence of an NFS bug, >>> >>> >> I was trying to be thorough, I hope I succeeded. >> > > The dd test sounded simple enough, but if you could include a transcript > of the commands you ran (together with the C code of any test programs) > just to be sure, that might help. > > --b. > > > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list